Sodding neighbours

VRSteve · Post by **VRSteve** » Sat Jan 07, 2017 9:25 pm

buzyg wrote:Yup, if you are injured on that ice he is liable, as far as I am aware

Nope

Mr Tidy · Post by **Mr Tidy** » Sat Jan 07, 2017 9:25 pm

Just a thought OP, but if I was thinking of the Raymond.harper extreme approach I wouldn't buy an old car, I'd just rent one for a day and take the CDW - then you can hit his car properly without having the post-accident arguments!

pvr · Post by **pvr** » Sat Jan 07, 2017 9:29 pm

Mr Tidy wrote:Just a thought OP, but if I was thinking of the Raymond.harper extreme approach I wouldn't buy an old car, I'd just rent one for a day and take the CDW - then you can hit his car properly without having the post-accident arguments!

Or courtesy car from the dealer.

buzyg · Post by **buzyg** » Sat Jan 07, 2017 11:09 pm

VRSteve wrote:
buzyg wrote:Yup, if you are injured on that ice he is liable, as far as I am aware
Nope

So it's just on your own land some one can sew you then?

mattyp · Post by **mattyp** » Sat Jan 07, 2017 11:53 pm

buzyg wrote:
VRSteve wrote:
buzyg wrote:Yup, if you are injured on that ice he is liable, as far as I am aware
Nope
So it's just on your own land some one can sew you then?

Struggling to see the point of this thread now, but its had me in stitches

buzyg · Post by **buzyg** » Sun Jan 08, 2017 12:44 am

mattyp wrote:
buzyg wrote:
VRSteve wrote:
Nope
So it's just on your own land some one can sew you then?
Struggling to see the point of this thread now, but its had me in stitches

That's the point of most of the threads. That and to keep me from the bottle.

Mr Tidy · Post by **Mr Tidy** » Sun Jan 08, 2017 1:08 am

VRSteve wrote: Nope

Good luck with that approach!

There are pretty good odds that the OP would have a successful claim subject to the prevailing weather, forecast weather, actual weather conditions and their similarity to prevailing/predicted conditions, although it may be a major PITA to get anywhere with any legal action - mainly thanks to Defendants with the VRSteve opinion!

(The real world doesn't generally work to the "Nope" concept) !

VRSteve · Post by **VRSteve** » Sun Jan 08, 2017 1:10 pm

Mr Tidy wrote:
VRSteve wrote: Nope
Good luck with that approach!

There are pretty good odds that the OP would have a successful claim subject to the prevailing weather, forecast weather, actual weather conditions and their similarity to prevailing/predicted conditions, although it may be a major PITA to get anywhere with any legal action - mainly thanks to Defendants with the VRSteve opinion!

(The real world doesn't generally work to the "Nope" concept) !

So you are suggesting that before anyone cleans a car they should check prevailing weather, forecast weather, actual weather conditions and their similarity to prevailing/predicted conditions????

Yeah OK!!!!

Bottom line is to succeed you'd need to prove negligence, and I don't see it. I see selfishness, stupidity, but not negligence.

Geezah · Post by **Geezah** » Sun Jan 08, 2017 6:54 pm

Stitches! Ha! Am I the only one to have got that buzyg?

sticky · Post by **sticky** » Sun Jan 08, 2017 7:16 pm

???? drival ???? try drivel, sew ??????? try sue. switch on spell check.

*AL* · Post by ***AL*** » Sun Jan 08, 2017 10:48 pm

Speak to him and explain your displeasure, that's always the first step. Be calm and polite, if it doesn't go well then you'll know for sure he's a pr#ck. Legally you can't do much, I'd just ignore the t**t.

ronk · Post by **ronk** » Sun Jan 08, 2017 11:43 pm

*AL* wrote:Speak to him and explain your displeasure, that's always the first step. Be calm and polite, if it doesn't go well then you'll know for sure he's a pr#ck. Legally you can't do much, I'd just ignore the t**t.

That about sums it up!

1. He is a pri#ck (1st Class )
2. I (and others) do ignore the t##t

I suppose there's not much more to be done.

Havard · Post by **Havard** » Mon Jan 09, 2017 12:12 am

ronk wrote:
*AL* wrote:Speak to him and explain your displeasure, that's always the first step. Be calm and polite, if it doesn't go well then you'll know for sure he's a pr#ck. Legally you can't do much, I'd just ignore the t**t.
That about sums it up!

1. He is a pri#ck (1st Class )
2. I (and others) do ignore the t##t

I suppose there's not much more to be done.

The "kill him" option is always open. I tend to find that if people think you are a nutter, they are more considerate.

H.

Confused® · Post by **Confused®** » Mon Jan 09, 2017 5:04 am

Shake your car mats off every time you see him cleaning his car, that should p*** him off. favourable prevailing wind of course.

Chris_D · Post by **Chris_D** » Mon Jan 09, 2017 6:44 am

Havard wrote:
ronk wrote:
*AL* wrote:Speak to him and explain your displeasure, that's always the first step. Be calm and polite, if it doesn't go well then you'll know for sure he's a pr#ck. Legally you can't do much, I'd just ignore the t**t.
That about sums it up!

1. He is a pri#ck (1st Class )
2. I (and others) do ignore the t##t

I suppose there's not much more to be done.
The "kill him" option is always open. I tend to find that if people think you are a nutter, they are more considerate.

H.

Zactly

Works for me everytime

Z4-forum.com

Z4-forum.com