Not joined yet? Register for free and enjoy features such as alerts, private messaging and viewing latest posts and topics.

3.0i versus 3.0si

2003 - 2009, roadster, coupe, facelift
User avatar
bmwangler
Member
Member
Posts: 552
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2010 9:26 pm
Location: Bath

3.0i versus 3.0si

Post by bmwangler » Thu Sep 15, 2011 12:36 pm

No doubt this has been discussed before, so apologies if I'm dragging up an old topic.

Many members will have owned/driven both the 3.0i and 3.0 si cars. just how much difference in perfomance is there?

Is the 3.0 Si much quicker? On paper there's not much in it, bur 30 odd BHP must count for something.

I'd be interested in opinions on this :wink:
3.0i SE Roadster/De-Badged/Sterling Grey/108's/Xenons/Pro Sat Nav/Stubby/PDC/Retrofit Bluetooth/Cruise/ ///M Steering Wheel/ZHP/ ///M Black Grilles/

jamie_z4
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 4621
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 9:38 pm

Re: 3.0i versus 3.0si

Post by jamie_z4 » Thu Sep 15, 2011 12:51 pm

Yes i've owned both.

there is a big difference, mainly putting your foot down in 6th the N52 seems a lot faster

I had a SI coupe and a 3.0SE roadster.

don't get me wrong the roadster sure felt quick too but the n52 is a lot more refined.
18 Z4s owned to date.

Current: 2.5i Titan silver

Daily driver: 480bhp M140i Shadow edition.

User avatar
JDM
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 2148
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 3:24 pm

Re: 3.0i versus 3.0si

Post by JDM » Thu Sep 15, 2011 1:23 pm

+1 on the above, although mt 3.0se roadster was an auto.

Better MPG with the si aswell :D
04 3.0SE Roadster, 07 3.0Si Coupe, 12 2.0iSdrive M Sport... Gone but not forgotten

Now proud owner of an Audi TT TFSI S line, Misano Red Amplified black edition... Don't shoot me.

Image

User avatar
peddy
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 3698
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2009 10:58 pm
Location: London

Re: 3.0i versus 3.0si

Post by peddy » Thu Sep 15, 2011 1:33 pm

I've had a mini drag up to 2nd with th30d0r3 in his Coupe and he was about 1/2 a cars length ahead.

User avatar
Zed Five
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 2290
Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 1:58 pm

Re: 3.0i versus 3.0si

Post by Zed Five » Thu Sep 15, 2011 1:40 pm

I've owned both.

3.0si is a much better car than 3.0. Anyone who tells you otherwise has not owned a 3.0si. :wink: Better / faster/ more powerful / better interior etc etc :lol:
Why is it that people who can't take advice always insist on giving it? 

E89 35is | BMW S1000rr Motorsport Ed.

User avatar
srhutch
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 26959
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 1:22 pm
Location: East Sussex, UK
Contact:

Re: 3.0i versus 3.0si

Post by srhutch » Thu Sep 15, 2011 1:58 pm

peddy wrote:I've had a mini drag up to 2nd with th30d0r3 in his Coupe and he was about 1/2 a cars length ahead.
He is just a better driver :poke:
Image

User avatar
peddy
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 3698
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2009 10:58 pm
Location: London

Re: 3.0i versus 3.0si

Post by peddy » Fri Sep 16, 2011 1:56 pm

srhutch, Funny you should say that because I totaly screwed up my 1st to 2nd change. LOL :oops:

The only plus I could give the non-Si is that you can SC it, but you can't with the Si (well I wouldn't recommend it).
Not sure, but am I right in saying the N52 has more common issues than the M54? :?

User avatar
Jembo
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 6030
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2011 11:59 pm
Location: 1066 Country

Re: 3.0i versus 3.0si

Post by Jembo » Fri Sep 16, 2011 4:45 pm

Zed Five wrote:I've owned both.

3.0si is a much better car than 3.0. Anyone who tells you otherwise has not owned a 3.0si. :wink: Better / faster/ more powerful / better interior etc etc :lol:
Can only comment on my lowly 3.0SE after a day ragging mine through the gears in Kent a couple of weeks back following PVR's //M which is even more of a car. He was definitely vaporising huge amounts of money into the government's coffers when we got enthusiastic on a few dual carriageways, but was amazingly surprised there really wasn't much in it at all...

so a 3.0 230bhp vs a 3.0si 260bhp, yep likely to be a bit faster but not by much, so suggest you find someone that will let u rag them both & make yr own mind up
Joined the dark side with a ///M Hell Bronze Sepang Coupe :happyclap:
Ex Aug 2005 Maldives Blue 3 litre cruizer, lots of toyz,

Lifer 54

User avatar
Blue
Member
Member
Posts: 537
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 11:52 pm

Re: 3.0i versus 3.0si

Post by Blue » Sat Sep 17, 2011 11:45 am

I'd love a go in an Si to see what the fuss is about, but my big concern over the Si is that it does seem to be an engine with more inherent problems than the M54 from reading the forums.

User avatar
bmwangler
Member
Member
Posts: 552
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2010 9:26 pm
Location: Bath

Re: 3.0i versus 3.0si

Post by bmwangler » Sat Sep 17, 2011 11:06 pm

Jembo wrote:..........Can only comment on my lowly 3.0SE after a day ragging mine through the gears in Kent a couple of weeks back following PVR's //M which is even more of a car. He was definitely vaporising huge amounts of money into the government's coffers when we got enthusiastic on a few dual carriageways, but was amazingly surprised there really wasn't much in it at all......
Really :o

I suppose fast is fast, but I'd expect an extra 100bhp to make a huge difference?????
3.0i SE Roadster/De-Badged/Sterling Grey/108's/Xenons/Pro Sat Nav/Stubby/PDC/Retrofit Bluetooth/Cruise/ ///M Steering Wheel/ZHP/ ///M Black Grilles/

User avatar
Jembo
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 6030
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2011 11:59 pm
Location: 1066 Country

Re: 3.0i versus 3.0si

Post by Jembo » Sat Sep 17, 2011 11:23 pm

bmwangler wrote:
Jembo wrote:..........Can only comment on my lowly 3.0SE after a day ragging mine through the gears in Kent a couple of weeks back following PVR's //M which is even more of a car. He was definitely vaporising huge amounts of money into the government's coffers when we got enthusiastic on a few dual carriageways, but was amazingly surprised there really wasn't much in it at all......
Really :o

I suppose fast is fast, but I'd expect an extra 100bhp to make a huge difference?????
I"m in total agreement with u... expected exactly the same... can't quite say what speeds we got up to but we found a few clear dual carriageways to ... make a little progress ... & was the subjeect of discussion at our pit stop... conclusion being the 3.0 in any guise is a capable motor, not quite as quick but still in there.
Joined the dark side with a ///M Hell Bronze Sepang Coupe :happyclap:
Ex Aug 2005 Maldives Blue 3 litre cruizer, lots of toyz,

Lifer 54

Zed_Steve
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 1187
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 9:26 pm
Location: Birmingham

Re: 3.0i versus 3.0si

Post by Zed_Steve » Sun Sep 18, 2011 2:33 pm

Jembo wrote:
bmwangler wrote:
Jembo wrote:..........Can only comment on my lowly 3.0SE after a day ragging mine through the gears in Kent a couple of weeks back following PVR's //M which is even more of a car. He was definitely vaporising huge amounts of money into the government's coffers when we got enthusiastic on a few dual carriageways, but was amazingly surprised there really wasn't much in it at all......
Really :o

I suppose fast is fast, but I'd expect an extra 100bhp to make a huge difference?????
I"m in total agreement with u... expected exactly the same... can't quite say what speeds we got up to but we found a few clear dual carriageways to ... make a little progress ... & was the subjeect of discussion at our pit stop... conclusion being the 3.0 in any guise is a capable motor, not quite as quick but still in there.
Breaker will like this. Cue the 'real world' debate' :fuelfire: :P
Now - N/A

Then... E89 sDrive35iS(2012-2013), E89 sDrive30i(2011-2012), E85 3.0si Sport Roadster(2009-2011), Z3 2.8(2005-2009).

User avatar
bcworkz
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 1740
Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 10:56 pm
Location: ǝɹǝɥ ƃuoɹʍ s,sƃuıɥʇǝɯos

Re: 3.0i versus 3.0si

Post by bcworkz » Tue Sep 20, 2011 8:36 am

Whilst shopping for my Zed, I test drove both back to back. At least in 2nd gear (freakin' speed limits :x ), there was an easily noticeable difference in acceleration, albeit not a huge difference. The si also has several options as standard, which may be either appealing or unappealing to the buyer. There's many reasons I bought the si, but the lower power would not have been a deal breaker on the i if other things were equal, as it's still quite adequate, On paper, the 0.6 sec longer 0-100km time is actually not insignificant. In the real world, it probably doesn't matter much.
Image
"The cause of most problems are solutions" (06 3.0si, sport pkg)

mason storm
Member
Member
Posts: 783
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 5:17 pm

Re: 3.0i versus 3.0si

Post by mason storm » Tue Sep 20, 2011 6:38 pm

Like others for me the runing costs vs additional speed are not attractive enough. If I thought the runing costs were about 15% more I would have jumped at getting an M. Also if I was someone looking for a car to take on track I may have a different opinion as I bet on track the M's difference in performance is alot bigger than it is on the road as you can use those revs easier and the brakes/suspension/dif will make a bigger difference.
2.5se Roadster - First Z
3.0 si Sport Coupe - now sold :cry:

User avatar
easty027
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 2151
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 8:34 pm
Location: South Manchester & East Yorkshire

3.0i versus 3.0si

Post by easty027 » Wed Sep 21, 2011 8:26 pm

I had a 3.0i for 3.5 years and once had a 3.0si for a week. the car did feel faster for sure. you could definitely tell the difference. especially when I then got back in my 3.0i after a weeks motoring.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Image

Post Reply