GP20 said:It looks just as stupid driving with the top down and un-tinted windows up. When the soft-top is down, windows should be down.
sp3ctre said:GP20 said:It looks just as stupid driving with the top down and un-tinted windows up. When the soft-top is down, windows should be down.
Here here... I do not understand why on earth people drive with roof down and windows up?!
DannyBoy said:Keeps the heat in and makes music tracks audilble on the motorway.![]()
sp3ctre said:DannyBoy said:Keeps the heat in and makes music tracks audilble on the motorway.![]()
So does having the roof up... and it has the added benefit that you don't look like a fanny! :rofl:
GP20 said:It looks just as stupid driving with the top down and un-tinted windows up. When the soft-top is down, windows should be down.
sp3ctre said:GP20 said:It looks just as stupid driving with the top down and un-tinted windows up. When the soft-top is down, windows should be down.
Here here... I do not understand why on earth people drive with roof down and windows up?!
GP20 said:It looks just as stupid driving with the top down and un-tinted windows up. When the soft-top is down, windows should be down.
I have 20% tint on my M. The film brand is Sun-gard and it's actually one of the lighter 20% tints out there (not all brands have the same darkness for the same % of tint film). If I could do it again I'd have gone with 30% or 35%. There's absolutely no visibility issue with my 20% tint at night, but 20% looks borderline ghetto. 30%~35% looks a lot more classy.
a11y said:sp3ctre said:GP20 said:It looks just as stupid driving with the top down and un-tinted windows up. When the soft-top is down, windows should be down.
Here here... I do not understand why on earth people drive with roof down and windows up?!
When it's minus feckin 2 degrees I still like having the roof down, but the windows up helps keep me warm enough to stand it LOL
cj10jeeper said:Why does 20% look borderline ghetto and 30% to 35% classy? Surely the darker the more 'ghetto'? Maybe we measure the opposite way? In the UK 20% tint equates to 80% light transmission.
cj10jeeper said:OK GP20 - then we measure the opposite way or at least the legislation measures amount of light that can pass though and that has to be 70%.
That of course explains you 'ghetto' comments![]()
cj10jeeper said:I'm not sure about that. My X5 was done pre delivery and is clearly written up as '20%' allowing for a 5% tint in the existing glass and keeping me clear of the 70% side window rule.
Pulled at random this site quote shows confusion is possible in the rating:
"Be careful whether the tint you are considering blocks 70% of light or allows through 70% of light. For front windows the regulations are about the amount of light that is allowed through. Also be aware that if you have a factory tint that blocks 10%, you will only be able to block an additional 20%."
Either way it's pretty clear what the UK rules are since 2004 and any tint company will be able to ensure the final combination of original and added is legal.
crooner12 said:How many of you have your roadster's window's tinted? I'm considering it, but I've heard others comment that it looks kind of crappy, especially if you're riding with the window's up and the top down. Also, if you tinted your windows, how much did it cost? Thanks!