Not joined yet? Register for free and enjoy features such as alerts, private messaging and viewing latest posts and topics.

Hunter alignment time...

2003 - 2009, roadster, coupe, facelift
User avatar
Ducklakeview
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 6362
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2016 4:08 pm
Location: Merseyside

Hunter alignment time...

Post by Ducklakeview » Mon Jan 09, 2017 1:53 pm

OK, just sitting in reception watching this get done. Yes, I am in Kwik Fit... BUT the centre manager is a friend, and the guy doing it knows what he's doing, and has done all of my prev cars..

Seeing as I've replaced the lollipops, rtab's and fitted limiters, coupled with the fact that I am now on 15 & 20mm spacers, I'm expecting it to be miles out.

He'd just weighting the car as per the requirements..


Also of note, is that they charge £49 and £25 respectively for front/rear adjustment if it's needed, BUT they now do something called Geo Care for £109, which gives you unlimited checks and 8 free adjustments for 2 years, which I think is a good deal..

Mike

User avatar
Steve84N
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 1828
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2015 1:00 pm

Hunter alignment time...

Post by Steve84N » Mon Jan 09, 2017 2:07 pm

You'll use 4 of those adjustments today and checks are free in most places...

I was charged £49 just for front toe (I needed a quick fix or otherwise would have gone elsewhere) which is ludicrous and they couldn't do anything other than what the machine says is factory spec rather than say zero toe. I was told it's because the machine is very good and expensive at £250,000 but they are about a tenth of that. Jokers. Someone else was told they couldn't adjust the rear toe.

Fingers crossed your branch is an exception to the rule.
Last edited by Steve84N on Mon Jan 09, 2017 2:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
C63 AMG Estate 6208cc

User avatar
ranski
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 6325
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 2:20 pm
Location: Sutton Coldfield

Hunter alignment time...

Post by ranski » Mon Jan 09, 2017 2:11 pm

Out of interest which model are they choosing in the hunter database for your car?

I have a 3.0se with M suspension and have mine configured as the Z4M. The only time i had a 4 wheel alignment as a E85 3.0 the traction control went loopy and was very twitchy to drive. I took it back, they configured it for the Z4M and all was good afterwards
Image

Z4 3.0 / Mods done... too many to mention

User avatar
Ducklakeview
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 6362
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2016 4:08 pm
Location: Merseyside

Hunter alignment time...

Post by Ducklakeview » Mon Jan 09, 2017 2:23 pm

Steve84N wrote:You'll use 4 of those adjustments today and checks are free in most places...

I was charged £49 just for front toe (I needed a quick fix or otherwise would have gone elsewhere) which is ludicrous and they couldn't do anything other than what the machine says is factory spec rather than say zero toe. I was told it's because the machine is very good and expensive at £250,000 but they are about a tenth of that. Jokers. Someone else was told they couldn't adjust the rear toe.

Fingers crossed your branch is an exception to the rule.
It's 8 further adjustments after today, checked that! The settings are WAY out, which I expected after the work and with the spacers.

I think it's very much luck of the draw with who is doing it, but this guy has done mine before, and is a bit of a petrol head, which means you can actually talk to him lol, which I find helps..

Mike
Last edited by Ducklakeview on Mon Jan 09, 2017 2:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Ducklakeview
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 6362
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2016 4:08 pm
Location: Merseyside

Hunter alignment time...

Post by Ducklakeview » Mon Jan 09, 2017 2:36 pm

ranski wrote:Out of interest which model are they choosing in the hunter database for your car?

I have a 3.0se with M suspension and have mine configured as the Z4M. The only time i had a 4 wheel alignment as a E85 3.0 the traction control went loopy and was very twitchy to drive. I took it back, they configured it for the Z4M and all was good afterwards
The options for the E85 were "with standard suspension" or "with sports suspension (lowered ride height)

He is using the latter. I've taken pics of the screens before, during and after adjustment, will add when I get home. He's been on it an hour and is only just starting the front adjustments. Rears are now spot on.

Mike

User avatar
Ducklakeview
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 6362
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2016 4:08 pm
Location: Merseyside

Hunter alignment time...

Post by Ducklakeview » Mon Jan 09, 2017 3:15 pm

Had a word with the manager. Has confirmed "unlimited" checks and adjustment for 2 years!

Just driven home in the rain, my God! The difference. Car feels firmly planted, also the traction light didn't flash once (DSC partially off as always) even on the last roundabout before home where I normally always get a twitch in the wet!

Will post up results shortly.

One question though. System showed front camber adjustment as being via the strut top mounting bolts, which it said were slotted to allow adjustment. Aparently mine aren't?? Anyone?

Front camber is now -1.4 max, but reading posts the consensus appears to be that more neg camber is better than stock, or am I mistaken?

Mike

User avatar
Ducklakeview
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 6362
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2016 4:08 pm
Location: Merseyside

Hunter alignment time...

Post by Ducklakeview » Mon Jan 09, 2017 3:45 pm

Ok,

Here's the results..

Image

Mike
Last edited by Ducklakeview on Mon Jan 09, 2017 10:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Ducklakeview
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 6362
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2016 4:08 pm
Location: Merseyside

Hunter alignment time...

Post by Ducklakeview » Mon Jan 09, 2017 7:48 pm

Ok,

So he said he couldn't move the strut tops to reduce the camber..

Just had a look, and they are actually slotted. He only loosened the nuts, and to be fair you can't see the slots as they are covered when the bolt is in the middle of them. I take it the small hex headed bolt is the infamous "camber pin" that I keep seeing mentioned? I unscrewed it and the threaded hole is concentric with the hole in the strut top mount, so assume they've never been out or moved..

Am I ok with the camber I've got now, ideally I'd like it the same either side, so will pop back tomorrow and have it adjusted, but should I increase the OS to match the NS, or reduce vice versa?

Mike

User avatar
ben g
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 7858
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 5:20 pm
Location: Essex

Hunter alignment time...

Post by ben g » Mon Jan 09, 2017 8:36 pm

Ducklakeview wrote:
Steve84N wrote:You'll use 4 of those adjustments today and checks are free in most places...

I was charged £49 just for front toe (I needed a quick fix or otherwise would have gone elsewhere) which is ludicrous and they couldn't do anything other than what the machine says is factory spec rather than say zero toe. I was told it's because the machine is very good and expensive at £250,000 but they are about a tenth of that. Jokers. Someone else was told they couldn't adjust the rear toe.

Fingers crossed your branch is an exception to the rule.
It's 8 further adjustments after today, checked that! The settings are WAY out, which I expected after the work and with the spacers.

I think it's very much luck of the draw with who is doing it, but this guy has done mine before, and is a bit of a petrol head, which means you can actually talk to him lol, which I find helps..

Mike
How do hubcentric wheel spacers affect the wheel alignment?
Red Soft-top Sterling grey 3.0i - Z4M Front, Eibachs, Polybushed, Clear headlights, Triple clear spot rear lights, Shadow Chrome 107's, Sport MFSW, ZHP.

User avatar
Ducklakeview
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 6362
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2016 4:08 pm
Location: Merseyside

Hunter alignment time...

Post by Ducklakeview » Mon Jan 09, 2017 8:46 pm

ben g wrote: How do hubcentric wheel spacers affect the wheel alignment?
They increase the length of the suspension, therefore the load. That's why the car sits ever so slightly lower with them on. It's not a lot, but it does change the geometry.

Mike
Last edited by Ducklakeview on Mon Jan 09, 2017 9:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Ducklakeview
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 6362
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2016 4:08 pm
Location: Merseyside

Hunter alignment time...

Post by Ducklakeview » Mon Jan 09, 2017 8:48 pm

Ok. The acid test..

Just taken my Z4 route to work, 10 miles more, but lots of fast twisty country lanes that I know well..

Car feels superb! Much more planted. Next step is to ditch the RFT's..

Mike

pp1600
Member
Member
Posts: 140
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2016 7:31 pm

Hunter alignment time...

Post by pp1600 » Mon Jan 09, 2017 11:54 pm

I'm looking for the factory settings (geometry) for my coupe but would like to use this current thread to find out more on the Z4's settings.

The settings that have improved your handling have gone from toe-in to toe-out on the front (fractional) which I find strange. Fast road cars have, in my experience, have favoured upto half a degree of toe-in to add straight line feel and predictability under braking. Race cars with toe-out suffer straight line stability with more responsive cornering are the exception.

If there is a z4 suspension guru on the forum please get in touch.

User avatar
Steve84N
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 1828
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2015 1:00 pm

Hunter alignment time...

Post by Steve84N » Tue Jan 10, 2017 7:30 am

Mike started with slight toe out on the front which may have felt a bit twitchy but now with factory spec toe in I'd say that's more than you want as it will have numbed the turn in somewhat. Something more like 0.02 either side would be better.

The imbalance on the rear toe is good to get fixed and 0.2 will be quite a stable rear end. I'd rather have about half that for a sharper turning ability.

Front camber just proves the point that they don't fully know what they are doing. You definitely want as much as you can get so increase the low side. However, you probably won't get enough adjustment with the slotted holes to match 1.4.

Whilst rear camber is to spec it's about a degree more than you need. It's designed to make the car very inert but it will wear the inside edges unnecessarily. You'll still be safe with 1.5 but it won't wash out at the front on a long steady turn. A true enthusiast would have explained this to you.

I have about 1.7 on the back of my car simply because it's lowered and I can't get it any less without camber arms. The front is maxed out to about 1.3 and I still get front push and would like more front camber relative to the rear.
C63 AMG Estate 6208cc

User avatar
Ducklakeview
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 6362
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2016 4:08 pm
Location: Merseyside

Hunter alignment time...

Post by Ducklakeview » Tue Jan 10, 2017 9:11 am

Steve84N wrote:Mike started with slight toe out on the front which may have felt a bit twitchy but now with factory spec toe in I'd say that's more than you want as it will have numbed the turn in somewhat. Something more like 0.02 either side would be better.

The imbalance on the rear toe is good to get fixed and 0.2 will be quite a stable rear end. I'd rather have about half that for a sharper turning ability.

Front camber just proves the point that they don't fully know what they are doing. You definitely want as much as you can get so increase the low side. However, you probably won't get enough adjustment with the slotted holes to match 1.4.

Whilst rear camber is to spec it's about a degree more than you need. It's designed to make the car very inert but it will wear the inside edges unnecessarily. You'll still be safe with 1.5 but it won't wash out at the front on a long steady turn. A true enthusiast would have explained this to you.

I have about 1.7 on the back of my car simply because it's lowered and I can't get it any less without camber arms. The front is maxed out to about 1.3 and I still get front push and would like more front camber relative to the rear.
Thanks for the input! Will pull the pin and get him to increase the camber on the other side to match.

Mike

User avatar
kis
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 4532
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2016 2:33 pm
Location: Surrey / West Sussex Boarder

Hunter alignment time...

Post by kis » Tue Jan 10, 2017 11:58 am

Ducklakeview wrote:
ben g wrote: How do hubcentric wheel spacers affect the wheel alignment?
They increase the length of the suspension, therefore the load. That's why the car sits ever so slightly lower with them on. It's not a lot, but it does change the geometry.

Mike
Does anyone know how they would effect the geometry? More negative camber? Toe?

What about if you changed wheels? 17's to 18's (and vice versa) any changes?

Cheers, Kis.
My E85 Z4 3.0i SMG

BMW Family History (past and present):
1 Series - E87
3 Series - E46 Coupe, E46 M3, E90 (x3)
4 Series - F36, F82 M4
5 Series - E34 (x2), E39
7 Series - E32
X5 - E53, E70
X6 - E71

Post Reply