Not joined yet? Register for free and enjoy features such as alerts, private messaging and viewing latest posts and topics.

What petrol (or Gas for guy over the pond!) do you use?

2003 - 2009, roadster, coupe, facelift
User avatar
sp3ctre
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 7495
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 7:29 pm
Contact:

What petrol (or Gas for guy over the pond!) do you use?

Post by sp3ctre » Sun Jun 24, 2007 1:35 pm

I just use normal grade fuel... try to stay away from supermarkets and stick to BP and Shell, but never really use the "special" fuel.

Does it make much difference to performance and fuel economy?

User avatar
enfield
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 2623
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 10:51 pm

Post by enfield » Sun Jun 24, 2007 1:40 pm

I only use Shell V-Power. In Canada, other brands have Ethanol in them and make the ///M 'cough'.
The Z4M Roaster & Croup are gone!
It's E92 M3 from now on.

User avatar
ovrkll
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 5936
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 1:03 am
Location: Mcdonough, GA

Post by ovrkll » Sun Jun 24, 2007 1:53 pm

I use premium grade (91 octane or better) or else the car pings under acceleration. As Enfield pointed out, ethanol mixes have been found to cause some problems with our cars. The premium grades have less ethanol (or none) than the regular grades of gasoline. :thumbsup:

User avatar
takedown8
Member
Member
Posts: 738
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 6:00 am
Location: Ontario

Post by takedown8 » Sun Jun 24, 2007 4:18 pm

Will also be using Shell V-power from now on thanks to intgr8r's experiment.
2005 Z4 3.0i, Maldives Blue, Beige int, Black top

User avatar
sp3ctre
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 7495
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 7:29 pm
Contact:

Post by sp3ctre » Sun Jun 24, 2007 4:24 pm

takedown8 wrote: intgr8r's experiment.
What experiment is that then?

User avatar
flyboyaj
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 2563
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 9:24 pm
Location: Sin City

Post by flyboyaj » Sun Jun 24, 2007 4:37 pm

I use 93 ontane. Once I accidentaly put 87 octane in and I did notice a difference in accelleration near the end of that tank. It felt like it took till the end of the next tank of 93 to get the full accelleration back. I put a 93 in with a 10% ethanol mix one time and it actually felt like it increased the performance a tad and I did get 30.1mpg off of that tank compared to the 28.6 that I normally average. But that mpg could have been influenced by so many other variables that I'm not convinced it was due to the ethanol. I had never heard that ethanol was known to have an adverse affect on our engines. Anyone have any more geek data or info about that? Or maybe a link to a site that has more details about ethanol in our engines?
Member ZSCCA
Image

User avatar
takedown8
Member
Member
Posts: 738
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 6:00 am
Location: Ontario

Post by takedown8 » Sun Jun 24, 2007 4:42 pm

sp3ctre wrote:
takedown8 wrote: intgr8r's experiment.
What experiment is that then?
Check it out:

http://www.zpost.com/forums/showthread. ... light=cold
2005 Z4 3.0i, Maldives Blue, Beige int, Black top

User avatar
Flycaster
Member
Member
Posts: 206
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 10:41 pm
Location: Boynton Beach, FL

Post by Flycaster » Sun Jun 24, 2007 4:49 pm

ovrkll wrote:I use premium grade (91 octane or better) or else the car pings under acceleration. As Enfield pointed out, ethanol mixes have been found to cause some problems with our cars. The premium grades have less ethanol (or none) than the regular grades of gasoline. :thumbsup:
I don't doubt that you heard your car ping, but I find this surprising in that the engine's computer will adjust the timing in accordance with the octane rating, thus eliminating chances for pining. From what I've read and what other have posted, using regualr gas will in no way harm the engine, but might somewhat reduce high end performance and gas mileage.
2002 TiSil 325i, Step, SP; 2005 Merlot/Tan Z4, 2.5i, Step

User avatar
ovrkll
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 5936
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 1:03 am
Location: Mcdonough, GA

Post by ovrkll » Sun Jun 24, 2007 5:01 pm

Maybe I should have been a little clearer.. hard acceleration. :D
I bought the car to drive hard, not dawdle about like a Sunday grandmother on the way home from church. :driving: :thumbsup:

User avatar
unionjack
Member
Member
Posts: 103
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 10:08 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX
Contact:

Post by unionjack » Mon Jun 25, 2007 6:12 am

Premium (93 octane) only.
Image
Alpineweiss / Imolarot | Premium Package | Heated Seats | Navigation | Hardwired V1 | Shorty Antenna | H&R Springs | Black Kidney surrounds

User avatar
Rick Hunter
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 3535
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 7:25 am
Location: Jet City
Contact:

Post by Rick Hunter » Mon Jun 25, 2007 7:01 am

Shell V-Power, 92 Octane. Wish I could find higher...
Image
'07 Imola Red Image Coupé

User avatar
Rick Hunter
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 3535
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 7:25 am
Location: Jet City
Contact:

Re: What petrol (or Gas for guy over the pond!) do you use?

Post by Rick Hunter » Mon Jun 25, 2007 7:37 am

sp3ctre wrote:I just use normal grade fuel... try to stay away from supermarkets and stick to BP and Shell, but never really use the "special" fuel.

Does it make much difference to performance and fuel economy?
Here's a good answer: Higher Octane Petrol
Image
'07 Imola Red Image Coupé

User avatar
pvr
Legend
Legend
Posts: 26402
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 12:27 pm
Location: South East UK

Post by pvr » Mon Jun 25, 2007 8:32 am

On the Scottish trip, hollpe had regular (supermarket) fuel and the other M's had 98 Shell. We got about 50 miles more out of a tank driving exactly the same (same speed / same route)
Current:
911-50 Black - unique spec
X5M - 575 hp of fun in a V8
Abarth 595 Comp.
Golf Clipper - collectors item
Z4 3.0si Black Sapphire
VW ID.3

Previous:
Z4M Silver Grey - non flimper spec (gone to Bing)
Z4 3.0 Toledo

User avatar
sp3ctre
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 7495
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 7:29 pm
Contact:

Post by sp3ctre » Mon Jun 25, 2007 9:14 am

pvr wrote:On the Scottish trip, hollpe had regular (supermarket) fuel and the other M's had 98 Shell. We got about 50 miles more out of a tank driving exactly the same (same speed / same route)
My maths ain't that great... does that mean it was worth paying the extra to get more miles? (take away performance for a sec)

User avatar
pvr
Legend
Legend
Posts: 26402
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 12:27 pm
Location: South East UK

Post by pvr » Mon Jun 25, 2007 9:20 am

at 40 litres, that is about £2 more for a tank, which equals to about 2 litres of petrol.

Getting 50 miles out of 2 litres would be nice ... so yes, it is worth it
Current:
911-50 Black - unique spec
X5M - 575 hp of fun in a V8
Abarth 595 Comp.
Golf Clipper - collectors item
Z4 3.0si Black Sapphire
VW ID.3

Previous:
Z4M Silver Grey - non flimper spec (gone to Bing)
Z4 3.0 Toledo

Post Reply